Showing posts with label Judaism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judaism. Show all posts

Monday, July 16, 2018

Bibles, Text


Bibles

Text


Which Text
Can we trust the text of our modern bibles?  Which text is that?  There are hundreds of manuscripts from which to choose.  There are several text type families, and sub families, two of them major: each requiring experts to decode.

What Language
What language do we even mean?  There is no evidence that paleo-Hebrew existed before 1000 BC.  What ever will we do with Moses (1406-1366 BC)?  Will we conclude with liberals that Moses is a fabrication and a fraud?  Or will we consider the very real probability that Moses wrote in a different language: say Akkadian, the era and location front runner.  If Moses wrote in Akkadian, a cuneiform language, then neither paleo-Hebrew, nor Hebrew are “spiritual” languages: the only languages in which Scripture can be written.  What we call Hebrew today is really block Aramaic script re-recording previous paleo-Hebrew documents after 516 BC: the Jews learned the new language while they were exiled in Babylon: by that time the Jews had left Yahweh and He had left them, except for a few notable prophets: there was no presence of Glory in the second temple until Christ came to it.  Which of these paleo-Hebrew, or Hebrew manuscripts even survives?  Precious few of them.  The Dead Sea Scrolls have a very uncertain provenance, and narrowing scope (look them up).  Which of these paleo-Hebrew, or Hebrew manuscripts is inerrant?  None of them; all of them are copies.  What language do we even mean?  Most certainly, not Hebrew.

Judaism
Can we trust the voice of Judaism which has fought against Christ and Christianity from 4 BC, down through the ages?  Absolutely not!  The Apostle John, writing in 1 John 2:20-28, has already concluded that Judaism is fundamentally against Christ.  By what authority, right, or warrant do we dare to reverse John’s ruling on this matter?  We have no such authority.

The Only Authority
Or must we trust Christ, Who, by all indications placed His stamp of approval on the Greek Old Testament?  If Christ and the Spirit, coming from the Father are the One(s) we must trust, then the Septuagint is what we must trust.  So, if we’re not involved in Septuagint studies, one way or another, were not using what Christ handed on to us: there are Septuagint translations of varying quality available.  Which of these Septuagint manuscripts is inerrant?  Not one; as far as we know, all are copies: not a single original survives.

Delegation of Authority
To whom did Christ delegate the authority to keep the Bible in the best possible condition down through the ages?  The Twelve Apostles, who delegated this trust to the Early Church.  For me, the best and simplest course of action is to cling as tightly as possible to what the Early Church handed down, and ask the Spirit to teach that to us.  Without this Old Testament, there can be no New Testament: for this Septuagint Old Testament was the Bible of the early New Testament Church: the New Testament was written from the foundation of this Septuagint Old Testament.  Can we trust the Septuagint?  Yes, we must trust the Septuagint: for it preserves readings that did not even exist in Hebrew prior to 1000 BC; for it is, according to all available evidence, the document which Crist endorses.

Remaining Difficulties
Does this simplify the difficulty of handling very many manuscripts, which are not all in perfect agreement?  No, it still requires dozens of experts to classify, decode, interpret, and verify these manuscripts.  Yes, these experts seem to change their opinions about the text every year.  Yes, this is still a confusing mess to clergy and laity alike: for few of us have the skills or the tools to cope with this complexity.  Nevertheless, in spite of what the experts claim, the Early New Testament Church is to be trusted as the faithful instrument of perpetuating God’s words on earth.  Therefore, the Septuagint is to be trusted because the Early New Testament Church says so.

The Only Power
If we have any doubts above and beyond this; we have direct access to the Holy Spirit: so, we should bring all of our concerns to the Spirit first, trusting that He will guide us in the right way.  Then, when the Spirit confirms what the preacher is preaching, and there is broad agreement among the people of God, we begin to have confidence that we are on the right track, in step with the heavenly Church.[i]

Questions
Do we have widespread agreement among the people of God, within the churches?  The gift of the Spirit should be the number one issue of agreement.  Close behind the Spirit, should be His teaching of the Septuagint.  In this we should place every confidence.



[i] Decisions were ratified by “The Whole Church”.  While this must mean The Whole Church gathered in Jerusalem; a body of any size statistically reduces the possibility that there will be objection to this decision anywhere: The Whole Church gathered in Jerusalem is a valid random statistical representation of The Whole Church everywhere.  A statistical risk remains; yet, it is very small; the only means to make it better is to publish it to The Whole Church at large.  Acts 15:22

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Hebrew Torah Scroll Discovered


Before we get too excited over this “find,” a few sobering thoughts come to mind.
·        That’s 1155-1225 AD, not BC: it is a “modern” document.
·        Carbon dating is a tricky and notoriously unreliable method.
·        Maimonides (1135-1204), the great eagle would not have approved this scroll.  How did it get past him?  Because it is older?  Unlikely.
·        Maimonides is not the first and only guardian of Hebrew text transmission.  If Maimonides were the first and only guardian of Hebrew text transmission, the entire Hebrew Scripture would be cast in doubt.
·        The Masoretes published as early as the seventh century, six hundred years after the Crucifixion of Christ, to create and maintain the standardized Hebrew text, which Maimonides later protects.
·        Both Latin and Greek translations preserve an older, better Hebrew prototype.
·        The Dead Sea Scrolls, which contain both Greek and Hebrew manuscripts, also provide better data.
·        This “find” needs to be confirmed by the firsthand examination of equally competent Hebrew text experts.
·        Even if confirmed, we have found nothing more than a beautiful relic, a piece of Bible art; nothing is changed concerning Old Testament textual criticism.  Not a single letter of the Hebrew text is improved.

This discussion confuses the issue.  The question is and ought to be, “What Bible was in the hands of Jesus and His Apostles when they preached?”  The emphatic answer to that question is, a Greek Bible: there is little evidence for anything else.  Paul was a learned Jew: why didn’t he write in Hebrew?  Peter was a Jew: why didn’t he write in Hebrew, especially in his letters to primarily Jewish congregations?

We add to this information the fact that during this period Christians and Jews were bitter adversaries.  No less than four hundred men vowed to abstain from food until they had killed Paul.  I guess they all starved to death.

Another question arises.  Why should we give more credibility to that which is handed down within Judaism, than to that which is handed down within The Church?  The Church is the guardian of God’s truth, not Judaism.

http://news.yahoo.com/old-torah-scroll-found-italy-university-library-152438195.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masoretic_Text

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maimonides