Showing posts with label Authority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Authority. Show all posts

Thursday, July 19, 2018

Bibles, Preachers


Bibles

Preachers

Listeners
Do preachers have Apostolic authority?  Is there such as thing as Apostolic succession?  Preachers everywhere complain that nobody is listening.  There is nothing new about this: for even God complains that no one is listening…
“I have spread out my hands all the day unto a rebellious people, who walk in a way that is not good, after their own thoughts….”[i]
[ii]Isaiah complains about the same problem:
“Who has believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?”
And Jonah is most likely crushed into an irrational insanity and death wish because of this willful deafness among his audience.  In fact, this willful deafness seems to be the common experience of all the great Prophets, writing in the Old Testament.

Validation
If these Old Testament Prophets are above reproach in unquestionable possession of Divine delegated authority; and, nobody listened to them: then the fact that people don’t seem to be listening can never be a good test of Apostolic authority.  Even though His sheep hear His voice,[iii] it may very well be that there are no sheep within reach of the preacher’s voice: the preacher must not be discouraged, when he feels that no one is paying attention.

Authority
Yes, we agree that there is such a thing as Apostolic authority, and it is handed down within the Church.[iv]  That being conceded, the true test of Apostolic authority is not whether people listen; rather it is whether the preacher clings to the Spirit and faithfully presents what the Spirit teaches.  Thus, all Apostolic authority derives only from the Spirit’s power and Christ’s authority: it is what it is, because the King and Vicar say so.  The Spirit may delegate that power of Christ’s authority to the simplest uncredentialled country bumpkin, as he does with Amos[v]; yet, deny that authority to the highest prelate: the Spirit alone, has the power to decide all such matters.

Pride
The proud preacher probably has nothing useful to say: for the power of the Spirit, the authority of the Word, and the voice of Scripture combine to humble us all.  The humbled and unheard preacher must find his courage, hope, and strength in Father, Son, and Spirit: not in any silent (inattentive and unhearing?) audience.  Faithfulness to God is all that matters at the end of the day.  Ultimately, the preacher must learn to walk in Job's shoes.



[i] Isaiah 65:1-7; Malachi 1:6

[ii] Isaiah 53:1; John 12:38; Romans 10:16

[iii] John 10:27-29

[iv] 2 Timothy 2:2

[v] Amos 7:14

Monday, July 16, 2018

Bibles, Text


Bibles

Text


Which Text
Can we trust the text of our modern bibles?  Which text is that?  There are hundreds of manuscripts from which to choose.  There are several text type families, and sub families, two of them major: each requiring experts to decode.

What Language
What language do we even mean?  There is no evidence that paleo-Hebrew existed before 1000 BC.  What ever will we do with Moses (1406-1366 BC)?  Will we conclude with liberals that Moses is a fabrication and a fraud?  Or will we consider the very real probability that Moses wrote in a different language: say Akkadian, the era and location front runner.  If Moses wrote in Akkadian, a cuneiform language, then neither paleo-Hebrew, nor Hebrew are “spiritual” languages: the only languages in which Scripture can be written.  What we call Hebrew today is really block Aramaic script re-recording previous paleo-Hebrew documents after 516 BC: the Jews learned the new language while they were exiled in Babylon: by that time the Jews had left Yahweh and He had left them, except for a few notable prophets: there was no presence of Glory in the second temple until Christ came to it.  Which of these paleo-Hebrew, or Hebrew manuscripts even survives?  Precious few of them.  The Dead Sea Scrolls have a very uncertain provenance, and narrowing scope (look them up).  Which of these paleo-Hebrew, or Hebrew manuscripts is inerrant?  None of them; all of them are copies.  What language do we even mean?  Most certainly, not Hebrew.

Judaism
Can we trust the voice of Judaism which has fought against Christ and Christianity from 4 BC, down through the ages?  Absolutely not!  The Apostle John, writing in 1 John 2:20-28, has already concluded that Judaism is fundamentally against Christ.  By what authority, right, or warrant do we dare to reverse John’s ruling on this matter?  We have no such authority.

The Only Authority
Or must we trust Christ, Who, by all indications placed His stamp of approval on the Greek Old Testament?  If Christ and the Spirit, coming from the Father are the One(s) we must trust, then the Septuagint is what we must trust.  So, if we’re not involved in Septuagint studies, one way or another, were not using what Christ handed on to us: there are Septuagint translations of varying quality available.  Which of these Septuagint manuscripts is inerrant?  Not one; as far as we know, all are copies: not a single original survives.

Delegation of Authority
To whom did Christ delegate the authority to keep the Bible in the best possible condition down through the ages?  The Twelve Apostles, who delegated this trust to the Early Church.  For me, the best and simplest course of action is to cling as tightly as possible to what the Early Church handed down, and ask the Spirit to teach that to us.  Without this Old Testament, there can be no New Testament: for this Septuagint Old Testament was the Bible of the early New Testament Church: the New Testament was written from the foundation of this Septuagint Old Testament.  Can we trust the Septuagint?  Yes, we must trust the Septuagint: for it preserves readings that did not even exist in Hebrew prior to 1000 BC; for it is, according to all available evidence, the document which Crist endorses.

Remaining Difficulties
Does this simplify the difficulty of handling very many manuscripts, which are not all in perfect agreement?  No, it still requires dozens of experts to classify, decode, interpret, and verify these manuscripts.  Yes, these experts seem to change their opinions about the text every year.  Yes, this is still a confusing mess to clergy and laity alike: for few of us have the skills or the tools to cope with this complexity.  Nevertheless, in spite of what the experts claim, the Early New Testament Church is to be trusted as the faithful instrument of perpetuating God’s words on earth.  Therefore, the Septuagint is to be trusted because the Early New Testament Church says so.

The Only Power
If we have any doubts above and beyond this; we have direct access to the Holy Spirit: so, we should bring all of our concerns to the Spirit first, trusting that He will guide us in the right way.  Then, when the Spirit confirms what the preacher is preaching, and there is broad agreement among the people of God, we begin to have confidence that we are on the right track, in step with the heavenly Church.[i]

Questions
Do we have widespread agreement among the people of God, within the churches?  The gift of the Spirit should be the number one issue of agreement.  Close behind the Spirit, should be His teaching of the Septuagint.  In this we should place every confidence.



[i] Decisions were ratified by “The Whole Church”.  While this must mean The Whole Church gathered in Jerusalem; a body of any size statistically reduces the possibility that there will be objection to this decision anywhere: The Whole Church gathered in Jerusalem is a valid random statistical representation of The Whole Church everywhere.  A statistical risk remains; yet, it is very small; the only means to make it better is to publish it to The Whole Church at large.  Acts 15:22