Showing posts with label Parthenogenesis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parthenogenesis. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

Cyril of Jerusalem, Lecture 12, Part C


Cyril of Jerusalem

Lecture 12, Part C


And the Lord spoke again unto Ahaz, saying, ‘Ask you a sign....’ ”  and “Behold!  A virgin[i] shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call His name Emmanuel….” — Isaiah 7:10-14


Summary: Jesus is infinitely pure; a fact which St. Cyril defends against his principal adversaries[ii] from Scripture, from Greek fables, and from many well-known miracles among the Jews.  This purity, is in no small part the work of the Holy Spirit in purifying Mary.  It is also truly and reasonably miraculous, considering that Adam was made from clay, and Eve from Adam’s side.  So, we must reject as heretics all those who deprecate this purity in any way; especially, any form of denial of the Virgin birth.  This purity is not only the vestiture of Virgins; but Solitary [men] have a share in it as well.


Preview:  25.  [Jesus] is infinitely pure….  “For if he who well fulfills the office of a priest of Jesus abstains from a wife[iii], how should Jesus Himself be born of man and woman?”  But, one Psalm says, “He that took Me out of the womb….”  “For the manner is different with those who are begotten according to the course of marriage.”  26.  “He is not ashamed to assume flesh … the veil of His Godhead.”  “There is nothing polluted in the human frame except a man defile this with fornication and adultery.”[iv]  Your bodies are the temples of the Holy Ghost which is in you.”  27.  But both Greeks and Jews harass us and say that it was impossible for the Christ to be born of a virgin.”  We stop the Greeks with their own fables: telling of birth from a brain, or a thigh.  28.  To the circumcision say, “Whether is harder, for an aged woman, barren and past age[v], to bear, or for a virgin in the prime of youth to conceive?”  “How then was the hand of Moses made white as snow, and at once restored again?”  Or how was Moses’s rod made into a frightening serpent?  Or how did Aaron’s rod bud?[vi]  29.  When the Jews still contradict, question them about Eve’s mother.  “Mary, therefore, paid the debt, of gratitude, when not by man but of herself alone in an immaculate way she conceived of the Holy Ghost by the power of God.”  30.  “But … a greater wonder than this … that the dust of the earth should become a man….”  Clay molded into eyes; dust into bones and lungs; animated, traveling, self-moving, building houses; teaching, talking; carpenter, and king.  “Whence, then, O you most ignorant Jews, was Adam made?  Did not God take dust from the earth, and fashion this wonderful frame?  Is then clay changed into an eye, and cannot a virgin bear a son.  Does that which for men is more impossible take place, and is that which is possible never to occur?”  31.  “Let us remember these things, brethren: let us use these weapons in our defense.  Let us not endure those heretics who teach Christ's coming as a phantom.  Let us abhor those also who say that the Savior’s birth was of husband and wife; who have dared to say that He was the child of Joseph and Mary, because it is written, And he took unto him his wife.[vii]  For Jacob called Rachel, wife, based on promise, long before they entered into conjugal relations[viii]: so Mary was Virgin, even though promised in marriage: so say both Luke[ix] and Paul[x].  32.  Even the manner of the event is attested[xi].  “Immaculate and undefiled was His generation[xii]: for where the Holy Spirit breathes, there all pollution is taken away: undefiled from the Virgin was the incarnate generation of the Only-begotten.  And if the heretics gainsay the truth, the Holy Ghost shall convict them: that overshadowing power of the Highest shall wax angry: Gabriel shall stand face to face against them in the day of judgment: the place of the manger, which received the Lord, shall put them to shame.”  For shepherds, Angels, offerings of purification, Symeon, and Anna all bear witness.  33.  Since [the Father], Spirit, and Son also witness, Christ says, “Why do you seek to kill me….?” And again, “Handle me, and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones….”  “Adored be the Lord the Virgin-born, and let Virgins acknowledge the crown of their own state: let the order also of Solitaries acknowledge the glory of chastity for we men are not deprived of the dignity of chastity.”  For Christ was nine months in the womb; but, thirty-three years a man.”  34.  “But let us all by God’s grace run the race of chastity, young men and maidens, old men and children; not going after wantonness, but praising the name of Christ.  Let us not be ignorant of the glory of chastity: for its crown is angelic, and its excellence above man.”[xiii]



[i] St. Cyril is clearly teaching from the Septuagint: for the Greek has παρθένος, virgin; whereas, the Hebrew has הָעַלְמָ֗ה, young woman.  Obviously, the Rabbis who translated the Old Testament from Hebrew into Greek (circa 200 BC), understood that young woman was not a suitable translation in this context: for young woman is not a sign at all, let alone the miracle anticipated by the context.  We should logically conclude that virgin is the only reasonable translation: but, the Rabbis came to this conclusion two hundred years before Christ was born.  Who knows who else holds this certainty from the time of Isaiah (eighth century BC), six hundred years earlier than the Septuagint; surely Isaiah did: but, we have no surviving written record, older than Septuagint.

[ii] St. Cyril calls out his principal adversaries by name: Greeks and Jews; both of whom harass Christians.  So, St. Cyril mounts his defense, not offense, as a rebuttal of Greek superstition and Jewish ignorance.

[iii] Already, it appears, the voluntary practice of celibacy was common, if not universal, among the priesthood.  St. John Chrysostom defends the same view at length.  Note also, that the office is here titled priest: we are not sure what else this might affirm or deny.  We have previously identified the risks of putting words into the mouths of ancient witnesses: correct excision is risky at best.

[iv] We recall St. Cyril’s belief that the flesh is not the source of sin; rather, the soul in general, and the will in particular....  This has nothing immediately to do with original sin.

[v] Sarah

[vi] St. Cyril defends from the necessity of miracles.

[vii] Matthew 1:24

[viii] Genesis 29:21

[ix] Luke 1:26-27

[x] Galatians 4:4

[xi] Luke 1:34-35

[xii] St. Cyril is not speaking of Mary’s conception; he clearly attributes Mary’s purification to the Holy Spirit.  These two ideas are mutually contradictory and exclusive: for if Mary is already pure, there is no need of the Spirit’s breath; and if the Spirit’s breath is necessary, then Mary must not be personally pure.

[xiii] While St. Cyril holds a very high view of celibate life; he will later explain that this in no way denigrates lawful marriage.

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

Cyril of Jerusalem, Lecture 12, Part B


Cyril of Jerusalem

Lecture 12, Part B


And the Lord spoke again unto Ahaz, saying, ‘Ask you a sign....’ ”  and “Behold!  A virgin[i] shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call His name Emmanuel….” — Isaiah 7:10-14


Summary: Jesus became man because we mere men could not endure His blazing countenance: so, He conformed to our infirmity.  He was baptized to sanctify baptism; He took our nature to save it, that we might partake of God; He intended to empty [Hell].  Keep this deposit [a trust] that God became Man.  The Jews disbelieve this in spite of many evidences.  Jesus, by virgin birth, is the seed of David, Whose kingdom and peace are boundless.


Preview:  13.  The Jews read these things; yet, did not listen.  Christ became what we are, men, because we could not endure to see “Him as He was”: for His appearance was brighter than the sun.  14.  Should Christ our Savior be “a minister of destruction”?  “Or that He should suit His grace to our measure?”  Daniel could not bear the sight of an Angel.  “So then after trial shown of our weakness, the Lord assumed that which man required: for since man required to hear from one of like countenance, the Savior took on Him the nature of like affections, that men might be the more easily instructed.”  15.  “Christ [also] came that He might be baptized, and might sanctify Baptism….”  “The Lord took on Him from us our likeness, that He might save man's nature: He took our likeness, that He might give greater grace to that which lacked; that sinful humanity might become partaker of God.”  His body therefore was made a bait to death that the dragon, hoping to devour it, might disgorge those also who had been already devoured.  16.  Was not Christ made Man according to the Scriptures?  “Keep … this deposit undisturbed, and let none remove you: believe that God became Man.
  “If the Jews still disbelieve: Abraham ate with God[ii], Jacob [wrestled] with God[iii], Moses saw God[iv], Elias heard God[v]: for a Prophet like Moses will arise[vi], a Prince will arise from Judah[vii], Who is the expectation of the Gentiles.  18.  Yet He rules them with a rod of iron.[viii]  19.  Even the time of His coming was told.[ix]  20.  The place, Bethlehem Ephrathah was known.[x]  21.  The Jews even contradict with damsel instead of virgin; but they are overthrown elsewhere,[xi] as is also the case with Abishag.[xii]  22.  If Hezekiah had fulfilled the prophecy he would have been begotten “nine years before the prophecy” was given; thus, there would be no prophecy.  23.  He was also the seed of David, by the eternal [covenant], not of Solomon; which was witnessed by the children[xiii], blind[xiv], Gabriel[xv], and Paul[xvi].  24.  These things trouble the Jews, who may wish they were burned with fire: for His kingdom and peace are boundless.[xvii]


[i] St. Cyril is clearly teaching from the Septuagint: for the Greek has παρθένος, virgin; whereas, the Hebrew has הָעַלְמָ֗ה, young woman.  Obviously, the Rabbis who translated the Old Testament from Hebrew into Greek (circa 200 BC), understood that young woman was not a suitable translation in this context: for young woman is not a sign at all, let alone the miracle anticipated by the context.  We should logically conclude that virgin is the only reasonable translation: but, the Rabbis came to this conclusion two hundred years before Christ was born.  Who knows who else holds this certainty from the time of Isaiah (eighth century BC), six hundred years earlier than the Septuagint; surely Isaiah did: but, we have no surviving written record, older than Septuagint.

[ii] Genesis 18:1-33

[iii] Genesis 32:24-32

[iv] Exodus 33:18-30

[v] 1 Kings 19:5-18

[vi] Deuteronomy 18:15-22

[vii] Genesis 49:8-12; Zechariah 9:9; Matthew 21:5

[viii] Psalm 2; Daniel 2:44

[ix] Daniel 9:25

[x] Micah 5:2; Psalm 132:6 (note that Cyril uses 131, the Septuagint numbering)

[xi] The proof consists of the fact that the בְּתוּלִֽים, which is not always translated virgin, must cry out, according to Mosaic law; and she must have tokens of her virginity; therefore the un-betrothed young woman of Isaiah 7:14 must have tokens; or, upon detailed gynecological examination, exhibit virginity in pregnancy, else she would be slain: the proof is both air and water tight.  Deuteronomy 22:14-29

[xii] 1 Kings 1:3, 15

[xiii] On Palm Sunday John 12:13

[xiv] Matthew 20:30

[xv] Luke 1:32

[xvi] Romans 1:3; 2 Timothy 2:8

[xvii] Isaiah 9:5-7