Showing posts with label Death. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Death. Show all posts

Friday, June 1, 2018

Cyril of Jerusalem, Lecture 20


Cyril of Jerusalem

Lecture 20


“Don’t you know, that as many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?  Therefore, we were buried-together in Him by baptism into the death: that just as Christ was raised up from death by the glory of the Father, so also we could have walked in newness of life: for, if we, [the] planted-together, have been begotten[i] in the likeness of His death, moreover also we will be of the resurrection.  Knowing this, that our old man was crucified-together, that the body of sin would be made powerless, that we no longer be slaves in sin: for, the dead, has been justified from sin.  Yet, if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live-together in Him; seeing that Christ, awakening out of death, no longer dies; death no longer has mastery of Him: for, in that He died in[ii] [our] sin, He died once; yet, in that He lives, He lives in God.  So also you, count yourselves indeed to be dead in sin; yet, alive in God in Christ Jesus our Lord.  [Do] not, therefore, let sin have domination[iii] in your dying body[iv] into submission[v] in her[vi] desires; nor commend[vii] your members as weapons of unrighteousness in sin; but, commend yourselves in God as alive from death, and your members as weapons of righteousness in God:[viii] for, sin will not have mastery of you: for, you are not under law, but under grace. — Romans 6:3-14


Summary: Having laid a foundation in the denouncing of Satan, St. Cyril proceeds to discuss the mysteries of baptism itself; especially that we share in the likeness or similitude of Christ’s death; which he shows from Paul to be far more important than the remission of our sins or our adoption, or even our reception of the Holy Spirit.  We have put off the old man and put on a whole new man.  We were cut from a wild olive tree and grafted into Christ, the true olive tree.  We have died in this similitude and been resurrected from the dead.  Not just once, either; but, fully three times entering into death, and three times being resurrected in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.[ix]


Preview:  1.  “These daily introductions into the Mysteries … are profitable to us; and … to you, who have been renewed from an old state to a new.  Therefore, I … lay before you [yesterday’s] sequel … that you may learn of what those things … in the inner chamber, were symbolic.”  2.  “… as you entered, you put off your tunic; and this was an image of putting off the old man with his deeds.[x]  Having stripped yourselves … imitating Christ, who was stripped naked on the Cross, and by His nakedness put off from Himself the principalities and powers, and openly triumphed over them on the tree.[xi]  For since … [your enemies] made their lair in your members, you may no longer wear that old garment … the old man, which waxes corrupt in the lusts of deceit.[xii]  May the soul which has once put him off, never again put him on, but say with the Spouse of Christ in the Song of Songs, I have put off my garment, how shall I put it on?[xiii]  3.  “Then … you were anointed with exorcised oil, from the very hairs of your head to your feet, and were made partakers of the good olive-tree, Jesus Christ.  For you were cut off from the wild olive-tree, and grafted into the good one, and were made to share the fatness of the true olive-tree.[xiv]  The exorcised oil therefore was a symbol of the participation of the fatness of Christ….”  4.  “[Then] you were led to the holy pool of Divine Baptism, as Christ was carried from the Cross to the Sepulcher….  Each of you was asked, whether he believed in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, and you made that saving confession, and descended three times into the water, and ascended again … hinting … at the three days burial of Christ.”  “And at the self-same moment you were both dying and being born; and that Water of salvation was at once your grave and your mother.  … Solomon … said, in that case, There is a time to bear and a time to die;[xv] but … in the reverse order….”  5.  “O strange and inconceivable thing!  We did not … die, were not … buried, … crucified and raised again; … our imitation was … a figure, [but] our salvation … reality.  Christ was actually crucified, … buried, and … rose again … that we, sharing His sufferings by imitation, might gain salvation in reality.  O surpassing loving-kindness!  Christ received nails in His undefiled hands and feet, and suffered anguish; while on me without pain or toil by the fellowship of His suffering He freely bestows salvation.”  6.  “Let no one … suppose that Baptism is merely the grace of remission of sins, or … of adoption …  whereas we know full well, that as it purges our sins, and ministers to us the gift of the Holy Ghost, so also it is the counterpart of the sufferings of Christ.  … Paul … said, Or are you ignorant that all we who were baptized into Christ Jesus, were baptized into His death?  We were buried therefore with Him by baptism into His death.”[xvi]  7.  “Whatsoever things Christ endured, for us and for our salvation He suffered them in reality and not in appearance, and that we also are made partakers of His sufferings, Paul cried … For if we have been planted together with the likeness of His death, we shall be also with the likeness of His resurrection.[xvii] “He said not, For if we have been planted together with His death, but, with the likeness of His death.  For in Christ’s case there was death in reality … but in your case there was only a likeness of death and sufferings, whereas of salvation there was not a likeness but a reality.  8.  “… keep [these things], I beseech you, in your remembrance; that I also, unworthy though I be, may say of you, Now I love you, because you always remember me, and hold fast the traditions, which I delivered unto you.[xviii]  And God, who has presented you as it were alive from the dead,[xix] is able to grant unto you to walk in newness of life:[xx] because His is the glory and the power, now and forever.  Amen.


[i] Born, born again, created: the new birth is clearly in view.

[ii] dative, His state at death, in our sin, not in His sin.

[iii] Third person imperative or emphatic, sin is the subject.  The Greek idiom does not require a second person imperative.  Do is supplied to make sense in English.

[iv] The force seems to fall just short of, “our dead corpse”: for we are to count ourselves as dead to sin.

[v] substantive infinitive

[vi] This is feminine, because it modifies a feminine noun, desires; so, what is the antecedent, if any?  Sin is the other feminine noun in the sentence: it is sin’s desires that are under discussion.

However, sin is said to reign in the body, which seems to contradict St. Cyril’s idea that the mind and will are the root of sin, the body being the innocent victim.

It is possible that St. Cyril’s concern is pastoral, insofar as he seeks to rouse the will to fight against the fleshly desires of the body: this is certainly necessary to sanctified Christian life; yet, these bodily desires, which seem to act involuntarily and independently of the rational mind or will, are only brought into subjection by decades of discipline: even then, they break out from time to time with surprising ferocity.  It is only through the power of the Spirit that we even hope to make any headway in this battle: it is a raging spiritual battle, which requires the participation of every Christian.  Nevertheless, St. Cyril’s pastoral concerns, if any, seem fully warranted; since Jerusalem was considered to be a licentious and wicked city in his day.  If the will is not aroused to engage in this battle; then, the soul’s war is hopelessly lost before it begins.  If the will is engage in this war; battles may be won or lost: but the Spirit brings the war to its victorious conclusion.

We perceive several possible errors of extremism here: the will has every affect (misnamed Pelagianism); the will has no affect (determinism); the will has power (category error); the body always acts independently of the will (excessive focus on involuntary muscles); the body never acts independently of the will (excessive focus on voluntary muscles).  Augustine’s illustrations concerning the penis are devastating to several of these excesses.

In modern times, John Romanides weighs in against Augustine; Georges Florovsky, and many others, value Augustine by appropriation.

[vii] Take a stand-beside, associate; in the political arena, to stand-beside in a photo-op, would be an implied endorsement of the person and any evil involved.

[viii] The opposing dangers here are: One.  To turn this into and justify physical war, or jihad, which this does not approve; Two.  To treat this lightly, as if no true spiritual battle were taking place.  This is clearly a call for commitment of the will; not a call to take up arms.

[ix] It is a vital matter of interest that St. Cyril gives no instruction about making the sign of the cross; left to right, right to left, or otherwise: he simply insists that we do it.  His descriptions of Baptism, on the other hand, are meticulously scrupulous in every least detail.  The Didache has such detailed instructions for Trine-Baptism; yet, these may be set aside as a superstition coming from an uncertain single witness.  Now, with St. Cyril’s voice also supporting the necessity of Trine-Baptism, there can be little doubt that the practice of Mono-Baptism is to be deplored and rejected in all its forms.  While we accept the persons Baptized by Mono-Baptism, we really wish the practice would stop: we cringe inwardly, in fear, every time we witness it.  Matthew 28:19

[x] Colossians 3:9

[xi] Colossians 2:15; 1 Peter 2:24

[xii] Ephesians 4:22

[xiii] Song of Songs 5:3

[xiv] Romans 11:17-24

[xv] Ecclesiastes 3:2

[xvi] Romans 6:3

[xvii] Romans 6:5

[xviii] 1 Corinthians 11:2; 15:2; 2 Thessalonians 2:15

[xix] Romans 6:13

[xx] Romans 6:4

Friday, April 6, 2018

Cyril of Jerusalem, Lecture 3


Cyril of Jerusalem

Lecture 3



“Or do you not know that all we who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death?  Were buried therefore with Him by our baptism into death….” — Romans 6:3-4


Summary: Baptism is the enactment of an event of spiritual death and burial, made effectual for sincere people by the Spirit.


Preview: 1.  Rejoice: for these are about to be cleansed with spiritual hyssop; to be united to the Bridegroom; the Spirit’s election according to faith; the wealth of the soul in godliness.  2.  Take away all obstacles and stumbling blocks; cleansed for reception of the Holy Ghost; washed by faith and repentance; come to the figurative wedding wearing a clean garment of grace about to be given.  3.  Each is about to be presented to the Angelic Hosts; be ready, be equipped with piety of soul and conscience: for the Spirit is about to seal your souls with a new power of holiness.  4.  Man is both soul and body; as the water cleanses the body, the Spirit seals the soul, that you may draw near to God; so, do not look for the bare element, but for the power of the Holy Ghost; lest being found unworthy of the Spirit receive not the grace; the soul being born again by faith, the body also might partake of the grace.  5.  But, why water?  Because water is noblest of the four visible elements: source of heaven and earth, beginning of creation and Gospel, making of the covenant, Elias’ up-taking, Aaron’s priesthood, a symbol of Baptism in the Tabernacle.  6.  Baptism is the end of the Old Testament, and beginning of the New; as John was end of the Prophets, yet, first-fruit of the Gospel; John is greater than: Elias, Enoch, Moses, all born of women; John a man of: no wealth, desert dwelling, locust and honey eating, wearing a camelhair garment, still loved mankind; yet, sanctified by the Holy Ghost, recognized, before his birth, his Master; since Baptism is a great grace, so is its founder.  7.  [John] baptized all Jerusalem, the first-fruit of baptism, in Jordan; confessing sins, they showed their wounds, he applied remedies; believers received redemption from eternal fire; vipers fled the coming wrath, they cast their old skin, as we put off the old man by fasting; for hypocrites, the axe is laid to the root of the tree, put away your hypocrisy.  8.  Bring the fruit of repentance, show mercy to the poor, enjoy the grace of the Spirit, wash off the former corruption; be sanctified; “persistent wickedness is condemned.”  9.  The Son Himself is the glory of baptism; greater than John, as the Word is greater than a voice, as the King than the herald; noble was baptism with water; yet, nothing compared to Holy Ghost and fire.  10.  Only the baptized and martyrs can be saved: for His side shed blood and water; martyrs being baptized in their own blood, the rest in water; all with confession.  11.  Jesus sanctified baptism by being baptized; who then despises baptism?  He was baptized to give grace; we, partakers of that grace: wherein we receive salvation and honor.  He broke the dragon, the strong one, that we might tread on serpents; the mouth of Death was stopped, the sting of death was drawn by baptism.  12.  You go down in the water dead in sins; you come up alive in righteousness; united to the Savior’s death, as well as His resurrection; buried in water, raised in new life.  13.  He “gives strength to wrestle against adverse powers: for being armed, you must do battle.  14.  Jesus did not preach the Gospel until after His baptism; this is the due order we should follow; the Spirit descended visibly for John’s benefit; so the Spirit descends an all with unfeigned piety; The Father’s voice says to us this is made My son: for is My Son belongs only to Jesus; He eternally by nature; but, we by adoption.  15.  Ready the vessel to become son, heir, and joint-heir; if preparing, if believing, if putting off the old man: for repentance cleanses even Christ’s murderers.  “O unspeakable loving-kindness of God!”  Without hope they were made worth of the Holy Ghost by baptism.  16.  Take courage Jerusalem; the Lord will wash by the Spirit of judgment and burning; He will sprinkle you to cleanse you; angels will dance; Who “comes up in white array”; the slave is made child; by water and the Spirit; bring forth fruit unto good works, blameless beside the Bridegroom; remitted of all sins by God.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Forgive us our Debts 4


Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,


I'm republishing this old letter because of our current national emergency.  I dressed up the type styles for you and reedited it.  What Moses and Jesus command is not optional.  This is a Christian problem.  I pray that we take it to heart.

Yours in Christ,

Herb Swanson aka Augie

Originally written around Saturday, March 17, 2012

Quote

Forgive us our Debts

Dear family and friends in the Lord Jesus Christ,

I just wanted to make sure you’re there and you’re okay today.

But, I’m so concerned about overthrowing our debt-slavery in America, that I’m now involved with it every day.  I guess I’m now writing to over 50 people a week, but I need to be reaching thousands and thousands.  Maybe you can help me with that.

The Nature of Salvation

Only the blood of Christ matters.  Everyone’s sins, without exception, are forgiven (1 John 2:2, John 3:16).  But so many people, having been healed of their sins, turn away from Christ; one way or another they say, “No thank you.  I don’t need it.”  So, they refuse the cup of salvation (Psalm 116:10-19) that gives them eternal life, and they go to eternal Hell because they just didn’t want the forgiveness they had already been granted.  But this great salvation is offered for the human spirit, mind, and body; not just the spirit.  The problems of this life, both mind and body, can not all be fixed; but, we still have a Gospel obligation to try to help each other with them.  And when specific sins threaten mind or body, and we begin to understand these sins, simply by reading our Bibles, we have an obligation to try to destroy them.  Every person alive on this planet has been set free from slavery to sin, we are not supposed to be living lives of slavery: not to false idols, not to each other.  Sadly, so many people love their lives of slavery.  They refuse the cup of salvation that gives them eternal life.  Of course, we cannot defeat every form of slavery, but we have an obligation to try.  We sin grievously when we are silent about such sins.

The Size of the Problem

I’m not a prophet at all, let alone a prophet of doom.  I’m just a guy who reads his Bible, watches the news, and prays.  I’m a happy-go-lucky kid who thinks it’s fun when other people are happy.  But I don’t need to have the gift of prophecy or be a genius to figure out that America is in serious trouble.  For example, the government bailouts are no longer running a few hundred bucks per man, woman, and child; they are reaching into the thousands of dollars; and soon may reach much higher, even as high as a million dollars per working family.  Gee, everybody who hears, reads, or sees the news knows that.  I haven’t got a clue what will happen to my family or yours, when we get a bill for a million bucks.  But I’m pretty sure, it won’t be good.

The Utopian Social Gospel Won’t Work

I don’t believe in the social gospel either, that we can win the world for Christ by just doing nice things.  I don’t believe in any utopian plan.  Only the shed blood of Jesus Christ fixes all of life’s problems: now and in eternity.  But the blood of Christ requires obedience among His disciples.

Other Problems

Federal bailouts are not the only problem facing America.  There is the national security problem, the whole death-culture problem, the business collapse problem, the job loss problem, the real estate problem, and a half-dozen or more other big national level problems.  All of them demanding and yelling to be fixed right now.

The Root Cause

But from the news, and by reading my Bible, I’ve come to believe that the root cause of all of these problems is debt.  That’s no special revelation either.  Lots of people are saying the same thing in the news every day.  “The greatest threat to national security is our debt.”  And on, and on, and on....  Blah, blah, blah....  And, they continue to talk all around the debt problem every day.  But no national level leader, no political candidate, no one is addressing the debt-slavery problem head on.

Deal with the Root Cause First

If the core, root cause problem is debt, let’s deal with debt.  We have to get out of debt, before it destroys America.  We’re all going to die anyway, we can’t stop that; but, we don’t have to die cruelly from war in our streets, famine, or defeat by a foreign power.  We don’t have to die, sinking into a Godless idolatry, becoming an unthankful, bitter, God-hating people.  We can see these things as enemies, fight them off, by the grace of God, and embrace death for what it is, the entry into a new and better life in a new and better place.  In the mean time, it’s not really in our best interests, selfishly and thanklessly to destroy the beautiful America that God has so generously given us.

We just have to break this debt-slavery.  Get out of debt ourselves.  Help our families, friends, and neighbors to get out of debt.  Yes, charity does begin at home.

How to Break the Root Cause

If we were only willing to listen to what Moses, all the Prophets, and Christ Himself so clearly preach.  If we were only willing to break our code of silence.  If we, the Church, would only rise up with one voice, our government would be forced to listen.  Our government can be pressured into writing debt-forgiveness and anti-usury laws patterned after the Jubilee, Sabbatical, and anti-usury Laws of the Bible.  Yes, Laws.  Moses did not write the Ten Suggestions.  Christ did not preach that we would be admitted into the Kingdom of His Forgiveness, even if we insist on being a cruel, heartless, unforgiving people who are willing to see our neighbors enslaved under the thumb of debt-slavery.

Forgiveness is not an option, it is the Law of the Kingdom of Forgiveness.

This debt-slavery can be stopped in its tracks.  Federal bailouts should stop.

Bailout money should be redirected: first toward crushing the debt and usury of the working poor and middle classes.

After all, it’s workers who pay all the bills anyway.  Let’s take this monkey off their backs.  Then we can work on business and government debt.  After all, the non-working poor and idle rich aren’t much in debt, but let’s show them mercy as well.  Then, maybe God in His rich mercy will let the jobs and freedom come back.

Yet, neither you nor I, nor anybody we know, has ever heard a single sermon on this subject.  Our silence is sinful.

Historic Punishment

So when I read in my Bible that God put both Israel and Judah out of existence as nations for these very same sins of Godlessness, unthankfulness, and cruel slavery of their own brothers and sisters; I have to believe that America is not far behind.  Please, we just don’t have to end this way.

A Personal Confession

I’m sorry I’m so caught up in this, but I’ve been guilty of being silent for so long....  Now, I have to speak up.  I wish that I had more time to spend with the people that know and love me, I owe them, big time.  But, this is a matter of life and death.  Thank you, and friends like you, for being patient and understanding with this poor fool.  I really do need to know that you’re okay.  At a very basic level, this message of debt-forgiveness, cannot exist or continue, without knowing that you’re there and okay.  This message is all about loving my neighbor, and I have around 309-million American and 7-billion World neighbors, every single one hurt by debt-slavery, but charity begins at home with just one neighbor at a time.  You’re it.  And I don’t mean that we’re playing tag.

Yours in Christ,

Herb Swanson
aka Augie, short for Augustine

Unquote

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Original Sin II



Three Goals

About Original Sin.  As you already know, my baptismal name is Augustine.  In part, I’m trying to defend my patron against contemporary slanders.

You also know that my driving force is, “We believe in One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.”  To this, I cling with fierce tenacity, and it informs my every thought, argument, sentence.  To this aim, I see in Scripture not merely an idyllic world, but an absolute mandate from Christ.  Not merely a Spiritual Unity, though that is all we presently have; but a bodily unity: for in the same breath we declare, “We look for the resurrection of the dead [necessarily bodily].”  To these ends, we receive one and only one baptism, which is always rendered bodily in the flesh.

In addition, I have some hope to arm you with facts to help you follow Christ’s course in life.  Humanly speaking, this always feels to us as if we make important choices; but we know that without God’s reigning hand in our lives, these choices are all futile figments.  Oh, that Christ would come to us once again, walking on the rough waters, commanding the raging sea, “peace, be still,” and bringing us at last to safe harbor.  Yes, it does appear to me that modern Christianity in general has cut itself away from its anchor (Hebrews) and lies in grave danger today.

With these three ends in mind, I have no certainty that I am right, or that others are wrong.  I have only the lights of Scripture and our Tradition instructed by Scripture, that Regal History which we have received from our Holy Fathers and Mothers in Christ.  However, I’m humbled by the fact that the famous ship pilot of Lake Erie storm, lined-up the wrong lights, falsely thinking that he had found safe haven, and drove his boat to certain death on the Erie shore.  These are God’s lights, not mine; all interpretation belongs to Him.

A Problem to Avoid

To be blunt, it seems to me that some Church teaching is to be avoided because of its contemporary stand on Original Sin, or the rejection of that idea.  I do not see how the idea — that we are not all guilty in Adam; and therefore death is not a punishment, but merely a result of the fall — can possibly be true.

Rocks for Good Foundation

However, I agree with many thus far.  Where real sin does not exist, no guilt exists either.  God is not unjust to condemn as legally guilty, those who have not sinned.  This, I take to be an absolute anchor point,

God cannot be unjust, it’s simply impossible.

We are caught between two immovable rocks:

God cannot be unjust and all mere men sin.

Two Inadequate Theories

Many others fasten on an idea of corporate or seminal headship [don’t know if you use these terms].  Sin is passed on from Adam and Eve, either because Adam and Eve represent the human race as presiders over it; or because it is built into the Adam and Eve genetic code.  It seems to me that both of these views are flawed, as some claim, and force God to assign guilt to the innocent: for in both views, none of the progeny actually sinned.

The seminal idea is just plain foolishness, for we end up with the idea that sin is transmitted through Adam’s genetic code, not through Eve’s genetic code.  This is the logical necessity for Christ to be born sinless.  How can it possibly be true that sin is transmitted through Adam’s genetic code and not equally through Eve’s genetic code?  Are not Adam and Eve both equally human?  Obviously, logic in and of itself is not a safe guide.

The corporate idea is no better, for I am made a sinner simply by Adam’s decision.  This, the prophets emphatically deny, “The fathers have eaten sour grapes and the children’s teeth are set on edge ... The soul that sins; it shall die.”  We may have escaped the seminal rocks of destruction, but we are no better off than we were before.  It is impossible to escape the idea that we have accused God of being unjust.  Me genoito!

A Sincere Proposal

It seems to me that the exact opposite idea of the seminal idea solves the problem.  That, we did not genetically receive sin from Adam; but rather that, we mysteriously participated in Adam.  Somehow, in a manner beyond all human understanding, we were there, in the Garden of Eden, physically, bodily participating in Adam’s sin.  Mystically, Adam’s sin is our sin, we did it; Adam’s guilt is our guilt, we justly deserve it; Adam’s death is our death, we certainly receive it.

The Third Rock, Death is Certainly a Punishment

Another issue is resolved by the passage, “The fathers have eaten sour grapes and the children’s teeth are set on edge ... The soul that sins; it shall die.”  Clearly, death is a punishment; yet we must return to this subject at a later date and give it more attention.  Therefore, we are left with three immovable rocks, and seemingly one more reason to reject opposing contemporary views: for God cannot be unjust; all mere men sin; nearly all die.  The 100% statistic of death knows only three exceptions thus far in history (Enoch, Moses, Elijah).

Christ

Moreover, I cannot see Christ as being merely my corporate head.  Christ is not just my president.  He is that, to be sure, but He is much, much more.  The descriptive metaphors of Scripture: head and body, bride and groom, foundation and building, speak of an intimacy of relationship that reaches far beyond any corporate idea.  The idea of corporate headship is simply inadequate for the riches of Scripture.  “That they may be one (John 17).”  “Speak the same things.”  “One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God.”  “One bread that we break, One cup that we drink.”  These all speak of an organic, bodily unity of great depth, a “body life” if you will.

Dissension

Some Christians reject others, sometimes even bitterly, over these things.  Many deny that there is any juridical aspect to God at all.  Some are even saying that love defines God.  On the other hand, particularly conservative Christians, often overcook the juridical aspect of God.  To be sure, Jesus is as Melchizedek, The King of Righteousness, but He is even more.  The death of Christ on the cross does declare me righteous; but it is also making me righteous; and it is healing the damage done to my body and to creation as well.  Yet, the continual harping on the juridical aspect of God is offensive, and has produced a bitter, knee-jerk reaction.

Why Bother?

In any case, I hope you see that I’m trying to thread the needle that will resolve theological conflict, avoid the rocks of God’s immutable and perfect justice; man’s inevitable sin; man’s nearly inescapable death, and yet warn you about dangers ahead.

I make no claim about being right.  I only hope for the complete reconciliation of the Church, that I’ve not misrepresented Augustine, and that I’ve not misled you or your colleagues or anyone in the Church in any way.  I cannot resolve the problem, I just don’t know how.  Perhaps we should learn from the Gordian Knot, or Occam’s Razor.

Pax vobiscum.  Your brother in Christ, “Even so, come Lord Jesus.”
Herb aka Augie

Friday, August 10, 2012

Original Sin I



We must bring this disagreement to naught because it has become a major obstacle to re-uniting the Church.  We must achieve resolution.  To this end, we examine Romans 5:12-14; 1 Corinthians 15:22; and Hebrews 7:4-10.

What is Original Sin?

It is sinful to believe that God assigns guilt where there is no sin.  We reject the idea that any sincere Christian makes any such claim.  We do believe that we, Adam’s children did sin in him and thus we are guilty.[1]

Romans 5:12-14

On this account, as through one man, sin broke into the world, and death through sin; and so death broke through to all men, in that all sinned: for until the law sin was still in the world: but sin was not accounted where law [does] not exist; but death reigned from Adam to Moses, even on those not sinning in the likeness of Adam's transgression, who is a type of the One about[2] to come.[3]

1 Corinthians 15:22

For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.[4]

Hebrews 7:4-10

Now you [must] consider how great this man[5] [was], to whom even Abraham the patriarch gave a tenth of the spoils.  And those of the sons of Levi, who receiving the priesthood, have a commandment to accept a tenth from the people according to the law (that is, from their brothers, though [also] having come from the loins of Abraham); but he having no birth record from them had received a tenth from Abraham, and had blessed him possessing the promises.

Now beyond any contradiction the lesser is blessed by the greater.  Here mortal men receive a tenth; but there [he receives a tenth while] self-attesting that he lives.[6]  And, so to speak, through Abraham, Levi also, [although] receiving a tenth, payed a tenth.  For he is still in the loins of the [his] father, when Melchisedec met him.[7]

Two Main Viewpoints

The opposing viewpoint goes like this: Adam and Eve sinned; but their children did not participate in Adam’s sin, are innocent of it, bear no guilt concerning it; yet they, with the whole human race, experience death because of it.[8]

We, on the other hand, claim that: Adam and Eve indeed sinned, their children also participated in Adam’s sin, are not innocent of this original sin, bear the full weight of guilt concerning original sin together with Adam, and die.[9]

So, the first issue that must be met is exactly who sinned when Adam and Eve sinned, and what are the results of that sin?

The Facts of Scripture

Let’s look at Hebrews 7:4-10, especially verses 9 and 10.  These verses literally say that Levi, the third son of Jacob, not being yet conceived, paid a tenth through Abraham to Melchisedec, because Levi was literally in Abraham, his great-grandfather.  The logic of the passage also insists that, Levi’s children received and paid such a tenth some four hundred years later as well, when they received the office of the priesthood.[10]  Literally, because of his “in Abraham” relationship, Levi and all his descendents were present with, and participated in Abraham’s one-tenth giving act.

Now, let’s look at 1 Corinthians 15:22.  The relationship “in Abraham,” parallels the “in Adam” and “in Christ” relationship.[11]  How is it that we die and even decay (present tense) in Adam, and we shall be made alive or resurrected[12] (future tense) in Christ.  No one questions the “in Christ” relationship; nor can we explain it, but all of us accept it as a literal reality.  Yet in this delightful sentence, “in Christ” is powerfully compared to “in Adam” by a simile employing “as ... even so.”  The comparison driven by “even so ... so also” is nearly exact.[13]  We are “in Adam” the same way we are “in Christ,” and very much like Levi, in Abraham.  We participate in the death and decay of Adam the same way that we presently participate in the life of Christ in Baptism, and shall someday participate in the life of Christ in heaven.

Finally, we examine Romans 5:12-14.  Verse 12 proclaims, “That all sinned.”  There can be no debate about this; the only discussion is over when and how.

An Analysis of the Facts

Because of these Scripture passages, we believe that we participate in Adam’s sin, and therefore are guilty.  So, if we participate in Adam’s death, we also participate in Adam’s sin, because we are present in his loins.[14]  We deny that sin is ancestral or inherited in any way.

This mystery is inexplicable, but not unacceptable.  We do not expect to understand this phenomenon.  We will accept it at face value for what it is, a mystery.  There is no scientific explanation[15] of it; there is no rational way to understand it; yet, Scripture proclaims it and therefore it is absolutely and indisputably true.

Others disagree.  They have a right to their opinion.  They look to expressions like, “so to speak,” “death through sin,” and, “those not sinning in the likeness of Adam's transgression,” or even the word, “type,” to interpret these three “in” relationships as figures of speech.[16]  But if one of these is a figure of speech, and not literally true; then, how is it true that we are “in” Christ?  Treating these “in” relationships as figures of speech leads to a two-pronged argument; let’s deal with the first prong now.

Honest translators must admit that expressions like, so to speak,” could indicate the existence of a figure of speech.  Levi and sons are not necessarily in the loins of Abraham.  Thus, we must agree, that if this is indeed our factual condition, it is extremely blasphemous to accuse God of assigning guilt where no actual sin exists.  Adam and Eve are guilty, but we would necessarily be innocent.  We, on the other hand, insist that this is not a figure of speech and the passage should be treated literally.  We did sin in Adam, and are necessarily guilty.  But we in no way approve of the idea that God would ever assign guilt where no actual sin exists.

The second prong of the argument suggests that, “death through sin,” makes no mention of guilt, so guilt is not present, and it is wrong to insert it.  But this is a mere subterfuge.  Guilt is merely a legal classification assigned where sin exists.  Are we to assume that Adam’s children sinned, and are somehow not guilty?  No, the whole issue is, when and where did they sin, and when and where they are guilty, for God cannot assign guilt where no actual sin exists.  So if we sinned in Adam, we are guilty in Adam.  But if we sinned outside of Adam, we are guilty outside of Adam.

The debate will probably remain unresolved.  We are not trying to persuade our opponents to change their minds.  We concede, it could be a figure of speech: although we firmly believe that, it is not.  We are trying to obliterate the idea that we, somehow or other, believe that God assigns guilt where no actual sin exists.  This is false.

Our Objections

We object to being accused of assigning guilt without a basis in sin.  We are saying, with supporting evidence, that we do not believe that God assigns guilt where no sin exists.  We are asking our opponents to stop accusing us of this sin, which we most emphatically did not commit.  We hope that all would see that no issue remains here, for our communion tables to be separated.

We object to the assertion that our idea is not Orthodox, when the idea is found among the Holy Fathers, even though they may have been divided over the issue.  If the Holy Fathers can divide; without accusing God of assigning guilt to the innocent; and still embrace one communion table; then so may we.

We protest the frequent tarring of Augustine’s name over this.  The idea of original sin may have originated with Irenaeus (d 202).[17]  Augustine (d 430)[18] may have coined the term as well, but his thought concerning original sin appears to be the same as, and to support our idea, “participation in Adam.”

We protest the claim of some who seek to tear down Augustine to support their point; namely, that Augustine knew no Greek and therefore strayed widely from Orthodox theology.[19]  Such a statement can only be made from a foundation of ignorance, for Augustine shows in his letters that, called to office by his Greek mentor, he was chosen for his linguistic and theological skill.  Working closely with his Greek mentor, the two ensured that Greek theology would be accurately expressed in Latin.  This would be impossible if his mentor knew no Latin, or if Augustine knew no Greek.  Augustine was also a supporter of the LXX, and wrote several letters to Jerome defending its primacy.  We conclude that Augustine knew a great deal of Greek language and theology, though he was modest about his gifts, and readily tipped his hat to the greater linguistic genius of Jerome.

We protest the idea that ancestral or inherited sin accurately expresses the Orthodox view of sin.  Either we sinned in Adam, or we did not.  Even if we did not, the cosmology changes, not the children.  It is now easy to sin, and difficult to do good.  We agree that man can no longer grow in his likeness of God.  The image of God in man is marred, but not destroyed.  But in either case, each man must sin for himself.  To model sin after some disease, and make it inevitable through ancestry or inheritance, seems to posit a cruel God who forces his creation to sin.  We continue in sin because we all sinned once, either in Adam or out of Adam.

Additional Problems

If we first sinned outside of Adam, there remains the possibility, no matter how improbable, that someone could live his or her entire life sinlessly, without any help from God.  Sin, under this view is a strong probability, but not a necessity.  The facts seem to be that no such person ever has existed.  This idea also seems to fly in the face of numerous Scriptures that appear to assert otherwise; namely that it is impossible for any mere human to live without sin.[20]  So the flaw looks as if it is insurmountable.  However, we do not desire to misrepresent our detractors.  So we are eager to hear an explanation.  Our only motive is to find the path of reconciliation by earnest interaction.

If we first sinned outside of Adam, so that there is no Adamic guilt, it is difficult to conceive of Adamic death, which is indisputably and obviously present.  But, we must leave this discussion for another essay and another week.

Conclusions

We conclude that:

·         God cannot assign guilt or punishment without the existence of real sin, for this would contradict His revealed nature: namely, that it is impossible for God to be unjust.

·         All men sin in Adam, but we concede that many Christians disagree with this view.  So we seek reconciliation without coercing the consciences of those that differ.  We believe that the restoration of communion is possible without resolving this difference.

·         We do not change prior to our first act of sin.  We all sinned in Adam, and thus caused both the change in our nature and cosmology.  It is now easy to sin, and difficult to do good.  We in our altered nature cannot grow in the likeness of God; the image of God in man is marred, but not destroyed.

·         The possibility of any mere man being sinless in the flesh is a grievous and seemingly insurmountable flaw, and we look for any reasonable explanation.

·         We must bring this disagreement to naught because it has become a major obstacle to re-uniting the Church.  We must achieve resolution.[21]

It is sinful to believe that God assigns guilt where there is no sin.  We reject the idea that any sincere Christian makes any such claim.  We do believe that we, Adam’s children did sin in him and thus we are guilty.

Yours in Christ,
Herb Swanson
aka Augie, short for Augustine



[1] For further discussion, see http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11312a.htm, http://www. catholic.org/encyclopedia/view.php?id=8782, http://www.religionandtheology.org/OriginalSin. html, http://www.auburn.edu/~allenkc/openhse/original.html, http://carm.org/questions/ about-doctrine/are-we-punished-adams-sin, http://bama.ua.edu/~msa/adam.html, http:// www.godandscience.org/apologetics/original-sin.html.  A full list of sources is encyclopedic.
[2] This is most likely a reference to the First Coming of Christ, “the One Who was about to come.”  But the possibility that Paul refers to the Second Coming of Christ, “the One Who is about to come.” cannot be ruled out completely.  Or even that, in Mystery, he refers to both.
[3] Our translation: For a smoother result, consult the New King James Version.
[4] King James Version
[5] Melchisedec
[6] Abraham, Levi, and all their descendents died; but there is no evidence that Melchisedec ever died.  Certainly, with reference to the type (Romans 5:14) of the Resurrected Christ, He cannot die.
[7] Our translation: For a smoother result, consult the New King James Version.
[8] Some authorities call this the correct view of Original Sin, while others deny that any view of Original Sin exists in Scripture.  This theory is sometimes labeled tabula rasa or blank slate, as well (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabula_Rasa).  Tabula rasa is the theory that people are born without any mental content, hence no memory of sin, no guilt, each person starts over with a clean slate.  While this theory or any other theory of innocence at birth may seem logical and reasonable, the question remains: namely, will any of these theories stand up to the scrutiny of Scripture?  Whatever tag is placed on this perspective both of these authorities are naming the same opposing viewpoint expressed here.
[9] Our view is sometimes termed “original guilt” by our opponents, because they insist that we impose guilt without the existence of sin.
[10] Acts 7:7 (four hundred years evil bondage); Galatians 3:17 (four hundred thirty years from the giving of the covenant to Abraham to the giving of the Law to Moses).
[11] Hebrews 7:9-10; 1 Corinthians 15:22
[12] The whole of 1 Corinthians 15 is focused on the topic of resurrection.
[13] The Greek contrast can be translated as either “as ... even so” or as “even so ... so also”
[14] Hebrews 7:10.
[15] An abundance of theories exist that attempt to explain this fact rationally.  We reject all of these.  Either Levi participated in Abraham’s act or he did not.  If we take Scripture literally, as we should, we are forced to accept the fact that Levi did participate in Abraham’s act.  If we are willing to make this into a figure of speech, we will be compelled to reject the reality.
[16] Hebrews 7:9; Romans 5:12, 14, 14
[17] See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_sin and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irenaeus.  Irenaeus was a hearer of Polycarp, and it is very doubtful that he made a serious error in his received Greek theology.
[18] See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo
[19] V. Rev. A. James Bernstein, Surprised by Christ (Conciliar Press Ministries, Ben Lomond, California, 2009) p. 223
[20] Psalm 130:3; Romans 3:23; 5:19
[21] This task of seeking the reunification of the Church on earth is the primary motive driving all of our essays.