1955
In 1955 Jones and Laughlin[i]
was a vibrant player in the steel industry.
A short time later J&L borrowed money[ii]
from the Carnegie Mellon Bank[iii]. Had we truly though ahead on all the
ramifications of exponential equations we might have predicted what would come
next. It world remain another decade for
Al Bartlett[iv]
to explain these to us in clear understandable ways.
This transfer of massive amounts of money did far more than
shift ownership from a Steel Man to a Banker.
What Bartlett might have warned us, had he been two or three decades
earlier, was the inevitable headship of major corporations by accountants[v],
followed by lawyers[vi]. Any sensible person knows that growth is
mathematically unsustainable, initially undetectable, and chronologically
overwhelming, the clock is ticking. This
is why accountants would take over to manage the money growth; as well as why
lawyers would be necessary to sort out the legal battles when it became clear
that growth was unsustainable and collapsing under its own weight.
In spite of these preposterous impossibilities, nearly all
business and government models are based on growth. Federal budgets might range between 2 to 5%
growth in conservative years, and even higher in progressive years. This means that we can expect the economy to
crash within fourteen to thirty-five years or sooner: it was planned that
way. In actual fact, the federal
bailouts seem to be following election cycles, crashing roughly every eight
years.
Still, around 1955, most of us understood business models in
terms of agricultural[vii]
cycles. Those were heady times: The Great
Depression (1929-39) and WWII (1939-45) were past; After the Stock Market Crash
of 1929, Wall Street was not widely trusted[viii];
The Chevy short-block was starting to take over the drag strip, and men could
feel the flow of power return to their muscles.
Big Steel would surely last forever.
Eventually, leverage[ix],
would far outstrip the pittance J&L borrowed post-55. Leverages of 90% would not be
unheard-of. The shift in ownership changed
much more than ownership.
† Banks now owned the corporations.
† Steel Men ceased to run the Steel business.
† The business emphasis shifted from making Steel to making Money.
† Money shifted the value of hard capital to mythical paper and electronic treasures.
† Usury soon made money outweigh real capital values by many magnitudes.
† While money was growing due to usury, real capital was declining due to age related decay.
† Money made business appear to be growing in a true downturn economy; so, market corrections became less and less obvious, less and less automatic.
† The ability to offset downturns with money, made the eventual downturns larger and more disastrous; instead of annual corrections, decade corrections were put into play.
Business collapse still wiped out the “old” owner, but he
was no longer relevant; the true owner was the “new” owner, the Bank. The Bank didn’t get wiped out. Why?
† The true profits had been milked off through usury. Having made and pocketed billions, a few million here and there is an affordable statistical loss, a cost of doing business: this is no different than a casino facing a big payout to a bid winner… and that can be managed too.
† In contrast to the pseudo-capital gains created by usury, the hard capital losses are now insignificant.
† The paper losses are now a tax-deductible line item; the Bank does not suffer: the tax paying public foots the bill.
† While hard capital losses are also tax-deductible they are still a real business downturn: the stockholders foot the bill.
† If paper losses spin out of control, as they eventually must, a federal bailout picks up the tab: again, the tax paying public foots the bill.
† The true owners, the Banks, are rewarded with executive bonuses and raises.
As long as the federal government is committed to spinning
off all down turn losses on the general public, on the backs of the
hard-working poor, there is no true business risk to the true owners, the
Banks: everybody else faces big risks and losses.
[i]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_and_Laughlin_Steel_Company
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._Jones_%26_Laughlin_Steel_Corp.
[ii]
Around 21% of its gross worth, as I recall… the exact numbers don’t matter.
[iii]
Today Mellon HQ’s from NYC; but as I recall, around 1955 it was Carnegie Mellon
Bank of Pittsburgh, Carnegie Steel, Carnegie Mellon University… you get the
connections.
[iv]
University of Colorado, Boulder, Dept. of Physics, circa 1965 or later
http://www.albartlett.org/presentations/arithmetic_population_energy_video1.html
https://www.albartlett.org/presentations/arithmetic_population_energy.html
https://www.albartlett.org/presentations/arithmetic_population_energy.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Allen_Bartlett
[v]
1975, to pull a number out of thin air.
Business historians could greatly sharpen these numbers for us: but,
we’re simply trying to recapture a very general picture from memory. If we err, you’ll forgive us: for, we’re
merely painting, where neither memory, nor oil on canvas permit great
precision… only, Monet like, in broad brush strokes….
[vi]
1985, in keeping with the theme of decades.
These are not real dates, just general tendencies… the tendencies are
real enough: major business magazines of the era were filled with the
discussions.
[vii]
Agriculture is now defined as, “turning oil into food”.
We remember that in an agricultural economy, that the amazing
growth of summer, must face the winter downturn, and begin again from zero,
next spring. Unlimited and unrestrained
growth, year after year, was and still is a physical impossibility. The lessons of “The Ant and the Grasshopper” were
still in play; saving for winter and other future needs were still
necessary. “Waste not, want not.” The bitter stings of the Stock Market crash
(1929), reminded us all that conservation was essential to life.
[viii]
In 1929, many corrupt and dangerous practices, such as churning money were
still legal. Even today, churning is
still practiced, albeit secretly. Few
people realize that money is made by shorting in a Bear Market. Insider trading is still legal for members of
federal government. There are many more
ways to make money than in a Bull Market.
Churning is still possible through the manipulation of large volumes of
commodities. The digital age has reduced
real money to split-second decisions.
The rest of us are happy to check our balances once a month.
[ix]
Leverage is the practice of borrowing money to accelerate business. When money is under limited supply, such as
in a gold or silver economy, leverage is also limited, borrowing is a zero-sum
game. But under a paper or digital
electronic economy, money is in unlimited supply: leverage has no boundaries…
just print or digitize more.
No comments:
Post a Comment