Showing posts with label Nicea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicea. Show all posts

Saturday, July 9, 2016

Symbol of Nicaea

O Heavenly King, the Comforter, the Spirit of truth, You are everywhere and fill all things, Treasury of blessings, and Giver of life: come and abide in us, and cleanse us from every impurity, and save our souls, O Good One.
Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us (three times).
Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, as it is now, was in the beginning, and ever shall be, world without end.  Amen.

Σύμβολον τς Νίκαιας
Symbol of Nicaea

The Father

Πιστεύομεν εἰς ἕνα Θεὸν: Πατέρα, Παντοκράτορα, Ποιητὴν; οὐρανοῦ καὶ γῆς; ὁρατῶν τε πάντων καὶ ἀοράτων.
We believe in one God: Pre-primordial Patriarch, Prime Mover, Prime Maker; of heaven and earth; of all things both visible and invisible.[1]

The Son

Πιστεύομεν καὶ εἰς ἕνα Κύριον: Ἰησοῦν Χριστόν, τὸν Υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ, τὸν Μονογενῆ, τὸν ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς γεννηθέντα πρὸ πάντων τῶν αἰώνων, φῶς ἐκ φωτός, Θεὸν ἀληθινὸν ἐκ Θεοῦ ἀληθινοῦ, γεννηθένταοὐ ποιηθένταὁμοούσιον τῷ Πατρί, διοὗ τὰ πάντα ἐγένετο, τὸν διἡμᾶς τοὺς ἀνθρώπους, καὶ διὰ τὴν ἡμετέραν σωτηρίαν, κατελθόντα ἐκ τῶν οὐρανῶν, καὶ σαρκωθέντα ἐκ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου καὶ Μαρίας, τῆς παρθένου, καὶ ἐνανθρωπήσαντα.
We believe also, in one Lord: Jesus Christ,
       the Son of God,
       the Only-begotten,
       the One begotten of the Father before all the ages, light of light, true God of true God, begotten – not made – of the same essence as the Father, for whom all things were made,
       the One Who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, was made flesh of [the Holy Ghost] and Mary, the Virgin, and was made man.[2]

His Works

Σταυρωθέντα τε ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν ἐπὶ Ποντίου Πιλάτου, καὶ παθόντα, καὶ ταφέντα, καὶ ἀναστάντα τῇ τρίτῃ ἡμέρα, κατὰ τὰς γραφάς, καὶ ἀνελθόντα εἰς τοὺς οὐρανούς, καὶ καθεζόμενον ἐκ δεξιῶν τοῦ Πατρός, καὶ πάλιν ἐρχόμενον μετὰ δόξης κρῖναι ζῶντας καὶ νεκρούς; οὗ τῆς βασιλείας οὐκ ἔσται τέλος.
He was crucified on our behalf by Pontius Pilate:
       He suffered,
       He was buried,
       He raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,
       He ascended into the heavens,
       He was seated at the right hand of the Father,
       He is also coming again with Glory to judge [the] living and [the] dead; Whose kingdom shall not end.[3]

The Spirit

Πιστεύομεν καὶ εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα: τὸ Ἅγιον, τὸ Κύριον, τὸ Ζῳοποιόν, τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἐκπορευόμενον, τὸ σὺν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ συμπροσκυνούμενον καὶ συνδοξαζόμενον, τὸ λαλῆσαν διὰ τῶν προφητῶν.
We believe also, in the Spirit:
       the Holy,
       the Lord,
       the Life-giver,
       the One Who proceeds from the Father,
       the One Who with Father and Son is worshiped together, and Glorified together,
       the One Who was speaking through the prophets.[4]

The Church
  
Πιστεύομεν καὶ εἰς μίαν, ἁγίαν, καθολικὴν καὶ ἀποστολικὴν ἐκκλησίαν.  ὁμολογοῦμεν ἓν βάπτισμα εἰς ἄφεσιν ἁμαρτιῶν.  προσδοκοῦμεν ἀνάστασιν νεκρῶν, καὶ ζωὴν τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος.  Ἀμήν.
We believe also, in one, holy, catholic and Apostolic Church.  We confess one baptism for the remission of sins.  We look for the resurrection of the dead, and [the] life of the coming age.  Amen.

Our fourth article of faith outlines The Church and her work. The only definition for The Church, to which definition we must look is:

“You have come to mount Sion, to the city of the living God, to the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect, to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, which speaks greater things than [the blood] of Abel.

“See that you do not refuse Him Who speaks: for if they did not escape who refused [Moses] who spoke on earth, much more, we shall not escape, if we turn away from Him Who speaks from heaven: Whose voice then shook the earth; but now He has promised, saying, ‘Yet once more I will not only the shake earth, but also heaven.’  This word, ‘Yet once more’, signifies the utter transformation of those things being shaken, as the mere institutions or inventions they are, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain (Which speaks of the final fulfillment of Daniel 2).

“Wherefore, since we are receiving an unshakeable kingdom, let us have grace, by which we may worship God acceptably with reverence and godly fear: for our God is a consuming fire.” — Hebrews 12:22-29

We realize that several earthy organizations have apparently legitimate claims as heirs of this, The Church, yet none of these earthy organizations holds such a claim exclusively.  God is the decider of all such things.

Her Oneness

As far as the matter of oneness is concerned, on this point we must disagree with a few statements made by Dr. Martyn Lloyd Jones in his booklet, “Authority” (IVP, Chicago, 1958: 94 pages).  Dr. Jones asserts that oneness is unimportant.  We disagree.  Here is why.

“Now I am no longer in the world, yet these are in the world, and I come to You. Holy Father, keep these whom You have given Me through Your own name, so that they may be one, as we [are one].” — John 17:11

“That they all may be one; as You, Father, are in me, and I am in You, so that they also may be one in Us: so that the world may believe that You have sent Me.  The glory, which You gave Me, I have given to them: so that they may be one, even as We are one. — I in them, and You in Me: so that they may be made perfect in one: so that the world may know that You have sent Me, and have loved them, as You have loved Me.” — John 17:21-22

“These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with His brothers.” — Acts 1:14

“And when the day of Pentecost arrived, they were all with one accord in one place.” — Acts 2:1

“And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,” — Acts 2:46

“And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, ‘Lord, You are God, Who have made heaven, earth, the sea, and all that is in them:’ ” — Acts 4:24

“And the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that anything they possessed was their own; they had all things common.” — Acts 4:32

“And through the hands of the apostles many signs and wonders were performed among the people; they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch.” — Acts 5:12

“And the people with one accord gave heed to these things which Philip spoke, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did.” — Acts 8:6

“It seemed good to us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men to you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,” — Acts 15:25

“For since we have many members in one body, all members do not have the same office: so we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members of one another.” — Romans 12:4-5

“Be of the same mind toward one another.  Do not mind high things, but condescend to men of low estate.  Be not wise in your own conceits.” — Romans 12:16

“Now may the God of patience and consolation grant that you will be likeminded toward one another according to Christ Jesus: so that with one mind and one mouth you may glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.  Wherefore receive one another, as Christ also received us to the glory of God.” — Romans 15:5-7

“Now I beg you, brothers and sisters, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, so that there be no divisions among you; but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.” — 1 Corinthians 1:10

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ?  The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?  For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.” — 1 Corinthians 10:16-17

“For as the body is one, and has many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ: for by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we are Jews or Gentiles, whether we are bond or free; we have all been made to drink of one Spirit: for the body is not one member, but many.” — 1 Corinthians 12:12-14

“And if they were all one member, where were the body?  Yet now they are many members, yet only one body.  The eye cannot say to the hand, I have no need of you: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you.” — 1 Corinthians 12:19-21

“There should be no schism in the body; so that the members should have the same care for one another.  If one member suffers, all the members suffer with it; if one member is honored, all the members rejoice with it.  Now you are the body of Christ, and members in particular.” — 1 Corinthians 12:25-27

“Finally, brothers and sisters, farewell.  Be perfect, be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace shall be with you.” — 2 Corinthians 13:11

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” — Galatians 3:28

“That in the dispensation of the fullness of times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in Him:” — Ephesians 1:10

“For He is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of partition between us; having abolished in His flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; to make in Himself one new man from two, so making peace: so that He might reconcile both to God in one body by the cross, having slain the hostility by it:” — Ephesians 2:14-16

“There is one body, and one Spirit, even as you are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.  Yet to every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ.” — Ephesians 4:4-7

“Wherefore, putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbor: for we are members of one another.” — Ephesians 4:25

“Only let your conduct be worthy of the gospel of Christ: so that, whether I come and see you, or whether I am absent, I may hear of your affairs, that you stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel;” — Philippians 1:27

“Fulfil my joy, be likeminded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind.” — Philippians 2:2

“Let the peace of God rule in your hearts, for which you are also called in one body; and be thankful.  Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.  Whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.” — Colossians 3:15-17

“For both He that sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all one: for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brothers and sisters,” — Hebrews 2:11

“Finally, be all of one mind, having compassion for one another, love as brothers and sisters, show pity, be courteous:” — 1 Peter 3:8

“This is His commandment: that we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as He gave us commandment.” — 1 John 3:23

“I, John, saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” — Revelation 21:2

From these many verses, we see the essential failure of earthly churches in the modern world.  Trusting a pseudo-spiritual unity, ignoring true unity, we fall short of real obedience.  Desperately needing each other in the spiritual battle we will have limited success at best, until we face the reality that there is only one holy city, only one bride.

Her Accord in the Spirit

There is only “one, holy, catholic and Apostolic Church,” which, as we saw in Hebrews 12:22-29, is headquartered in heaven under the supreme command of the Son of God, Jesus, Who is also called Christ.  From Acts 1:8 we also learn that the Holy Spirit is The Vicar of Christ on Earth.

“You shall receive power, when the Holy Spirit has come upon you: and you shall be My witnesses, both in Jerusalem, in all Judaea, in Samaria, and to the end of the earth.”

The rest of Acts provides an ample sample record of this powerful working of the Holy Spirit.  This record speaks repeatedly about the oneness of The Church, which was born on Pentecost, 33 AD.  We have quoted many such verses about the oneness of The Church; yet, these are only a few of the many more passages that could be found.  Among these verses, several speak specifically about one accord, the perfect agreement that existed in The Church in its first days.

“These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with His brothers.” — Acts 1:14

“And when the day of Pentecost arrived, they were all with one accord in one place.” — Acts 2:1

“And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,” — Acts 2:46

“And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, ‘Lord, You are God, Who have made heaven, earth, the sea, and all that is in them:’ ” — Acts 4:24

“And through the hands of the apostles many signs and wonders were performed among the people; they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch.” — Acts 5:12

“And the people with one accord gave heed to these things which Philip spoke, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did.” — Acts 8:6

“It seemed good to us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men to you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,” — Acts 15:25

“Now may the God of patience and consolation grant that you will be likeminded toward one another according to Christ Jesus: so that with one mind and one mouth you may glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.  Wherefore receive one another, as Christ also received us to the glory of God.” — Romans 15:5-7

“Fulfil my joy, be likeminded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind.” — Philippians 2:2

Her Enemies

The enemies of The Church also gather with one accord.

“Then they cried out with a loud voice, and shut their ears, and ran upon him with one accord,” — Acts 7:57

“Herod was highly displeased with the people from Tyre and Sidon: but they came with one accord to him, and, having made Blastus, the king’s chamberlain, their friend, desired peace; because their country was supplied by the king’s country.” — Acts 12:20

“When Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, the Jews made insurrection with one accord against Paul, and brought him to the judgment seat,” — Acts 18:12

“The whole city was filled with confusion: and having arrested Gaius and Aristarchus, men of Macedonia, Paul’s traveling companions, they rushed into the theatre with one accord.” — Acts 19:29

Her Battle Lines

We see then that The Church is set in array at prayer against the enemies of God, who are equally arrayed, and frequently more unified.  We do well to ask, where the dividing line might be drawn between these great armies: for the tares are sown throughout the wheat field (Matthew 13:25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 36, 38, 40).  We read:

“He who is not with Me is against Me; and he who does not gather with me scatters.” — Matthew 12:30

“Whoever shall be ashamed of Me and of My words in this adulterous and sinful generation; the Son of Man shall also be ashamed of him, when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.” — Mark 8:38

“For he that is not against us is for us.” — Mark 9:40

“He has showed strength with His arm; He has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts.” — Luke 1:51

“Jesus said to [John], ‘Do not forbid him: for he who is not against us is for us.’ ” — Luke 9:50

“He who is not with Me is against Me: and he that does not gather with Me scatters.” — Luke 11:23

“He who is an hireling, not the shepherd, the sheep are not his own, sees the wolf coming, leaves the sheep, and flees: so the wolf catches them, and scatters the sheep.” — John 10:12

“Truly, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, against Your holy child Jesus, Whom You have anointed.” — Acts 4:27

“[When] Saul was consenting to [Stephen’s] death.  At that time there was a great persecution against the church at Jerusalem; they were all scattered abroad throughout Judaea and Samaria, except for the apostles.” — Acts 8:1

“The flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.” — Galatians 5:17

“We do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” — Ephesians 6:12

“Consider Him Who endured such contradiction of sinners against Himself, lest you be weary and faint in your minds.” — Hebrews 12:3

“Your gold and silver have been corroded away; and their corrosion shall be a witness against you, which will eat your flesh as if it were fire.  You have heaped wealth together for the end of days.” — James 5:3

“The eyes of the Lord watch over the righteous, and his ears hear their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil.” — 1 Peter 3:12

“When I come, I will remember his deeds which he does, prating against us with malicious words: and not even content with these, he himself does not receive the brothers and sisters, yet he forbids those who would receive them, and casts them out of the church.” — 3 John 10

“I have a few things against you, because you have those who hold the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to set a trap for the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit fornication.” — Revelation 2:14

“I have a few things against you, because you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed to idols.” — Revelation 2:20

We see then, that this battle line of spiritual warfare extends to the utmost extremities of the Universe; to the heights of leadership among both angels and men; to the castles and mansions of the wealthiest; it penetrates and pervades everything, even the hallowed halls of churches, and the inner sanctums of the human heart.  In such a spiritual warfare we do best to err on the side of mercy; as well as to cling to the Holy Spirit.

Our Obedience

“He shall have judgment without mercy, who shows no mercy: mercy trumps judgment.” — James 2:13

“The wisdom, which is from above, is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, easily approachable, full of mercy with good fruit, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.” — James 3:17

“All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit shall not be forgiven men.” — Matthew 12:31

“Then Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.’ ” — Acts 2:38

“Have you received the Holy Spirit since you believed?  And they said to him, ‘We have not so much as heard whether there is any Holy Spirit.’ ” — Acts 19:2

“Don’t you know that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?” — Romans 6:3

“Is Christ divided?  Was Paul crucified for you?  Were you baptized in the name of Paul?” — 1 Corinthians 1:13

“For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.” — Galatians 3:27


[1] We could use your help here.  We tried to capture the punch (pardon the pun) of these three Greek names for God, all of which begin with the letter P: Patera = Father, Pantokratora = Almighty or All ruling, Poiêthên = Creator or Maker.  We think you can come up with a better way to capture this idea of three words beginning with the same letter.  Please help make the punch of the P’s pop.

The main concept is that the three P’s hang together in Greek.  In English we try to make the sentence read “Creator of heaven and earth.” Still, God is just as much the Father of heaven and earth; just as much the Ruler of heaven and earth, as He is Creator of all these things.

So there is a kind of triple three dimensionality to the prayer.  We see the three names of God which we do not understand.  We see the heaven and earth which are also beyond our grasp.  Finally, we compare the sensate world with one that cannot be measured by the five senses or by science, and now we have lost all hope of understanding.  The glory, immensity, and wonder of God, are reflected in the overwhelming vastness of the universe, and the infinitesimal nature of mater is exemplified by the Higgs particles.  Finally, such glory insists that beyond the majesty of nature, over and above everything around us, that another order of creation, a spirit world exists, which cannot even be felt by ordinary human means.

To what does this prayer declaration of the immensity of God call us?  In 325 it called 318 pastors together to try to unify The Church against several growing heresies: they fell short of perfection, but to their credit many disputes were resolved, they did a better job than anyone since.  Today, more than ever, The Christian Church needs to stand together.  What prevents us from standing together with these 318 pastors to pray this prayer with them?  If we could do that, we might see God change our world.

[2] This is all about who Jesus is as a person.

Maybe we get all hung up over the words, same essence, or sometimes the translation, same substance.  The problem with same substance is that it seems to imply that God has material substance, which is untrue.

The real problem here is that in 325, no Greek words could be found to adequately name the unknowable internal nature of God, His being.  At least two words were found, synonyms, these were pressed into service in spite of the difficulties, and given new technical meaning.

The trouble with this solution was that different parties preferred different words.  The above solution satisfied about 2/3 of all parties concerned, which was better than none.  Still, we are left with ongoing divisions today.  Does Jesus have one nature or two (one Divine and one human)?  Does Jesus have one will or two (one Divine and one human)?

The Greek words selected were ousia and hypostasis.  Arbitrarily, the word ousia was chosen to represent God as the Trinitarian Whole.  Thus Jesus is of the same identical ousia as the Father and the Spirit.  The word hypostasis was chosen to represent the three distinct, yet inseparable, persons.  So there is only One ousia in three hypostases.  Jesus’ hypostasis is different in that He adds to Himself a perfect human nature: He is God-man, Theanthropos, or Theandros.

It is not as though the words ousia and hypostasis have some real human meaning: they were chosen to name that which was not, and still is not understood: they have technical meaning.  Any reality that they express is their heavenly reality, which is still beyond our grasp.

One might hope that after what is now approaching two thousand years, we might have got this word mix-up sorted out.  Alas, such is not the case.  What is wrong with us that after 1,691 years, we still haven’t got this sorted out?  This is just a root of bitterness.  We have no good excuse for not coming together as the 318 pastors tried to come together in 325.  For them there were communication barriers: it took years to get letters around the empire.  Today, such communication takes place in seconds.  What is wrong with us that we cannot stand together with the 318 pastors over the issue of who Jesus is?

[3] This is all about what Jesus, the God-man did.

The term, “by Pontius Pilate,” does not harp on Pilate’s personal sins, which were no more terrible than Paul’s.  “By” indicates the governing authority under which the crucifixion was authorized: it was under Pilate, an authorized Roman representative (fifth prefect of the Roman province of Judaea).  The crucifixion of Jesus was a legal act under Roman law.  The term, “by Pontius Pilate,” also fixes the date of the crucifixion to the prefecture of Pilate (26-36).

The phrase, “He descended into hell,” from the Apostles Creed, is not found here.  This is not a big issue.  This phrase might easily have been added, it was certainly believed, and a page or two of supporting Scripture is not difficult to find.

What is contained in these phrases that does not come directly from Scripture?  What is found in these phrases about which we may still disagree?  What is wrong with us that we cannot stand together with the 318 pastors over the issue of what Jesus did?

[4] By 381 AD most or all of the original 318 pastors had fallen asleep.  The Nicaean statement of faith had made its way throughout most or all of Christendom, had been ratified by the churches, and returned with suggested amendments.  Constantinople had changed too, and was now the dedicated capital city of the Roman Empire.  So 150 pastors met in Constantinople at 381 AD, a few miles away from Nicaea.

The main amendment was this addition describing the person and work of the Spirit.  In a secondary amendment, the word, “we believe”, was not repeated in each paragraph: in Greek, the word, “and”, is sufficient to carry the force and meaning of the opening word, “we believe”; since this is not true in English we added the original word, “we believe”, back in again, in order to make the meaning very clear.  This is a statement of faith, a prayer, from beginning to end: it has four main paragraphs concerning Christian faith, each beginning with, “we believe”.  The details of these and other amendments are found in this link.


After the late 6th century, the Filioque controversy arose over this one Latin word, “filioque”.  While there are many theories about the source of this word, we believe it is best understood as a scribal copying error: a fatigued scribe simply inserted the words, “and Son” into the previous phrase by mistake.  Some insist that such an error can only happen in the forward direction.  However, we have over five years (over 5,000 hours, over 10,000 – 8-1/2 x 11 pages, all hand lettered) experience in scribal work, and assure you that this sort of error was committed many times, both backward and forward.  Those who wish to assign blame, or insert profound theologies concerning these two Greek words are not serving the peace of The Church.  Because these two words have no historic basis in early manuscripts, serve no biblical necessity, and are offensive to many: we simply left them out in the interests of peace.

What remains with which we cannot all agree?  Why do we continue to grieve and quench the Spirit by our divisiveness?

[5] If you have been blessed or helped by any of these meditations, please repost, share, or use any of them as you wish.  No rights are reserved.  They are designed and intended for your free participation.  They were freely received, and are freely given.  No other permission is required for their use.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Let’s Take Nicea Apart, Part III B


Okay, maybe the Universe doesn’t turn on a word.  However, it certainly does turn on the Nature of God.  Everything we talk about will ultimately start and end with the Nature of God.  That’s why the word ousia is so important and why we must find a way to agree about it.

Singling out a Single Attribute

Eventually we want to look at all the attributes of God’s Nature together.  That investigation is way down the road.  What’s important here is the realization that God’s Nature is one piece, and doesn’t function in parts.  The problem of taking things one-at-a-time constantly confronts us humans.  We must do our best to understand that each piece fits into the whole picture.  That’s hard, but we’ve got to do this if we’re going to keep any sense of balance, or even sort things out halfway right.  We must struggle to understand God as three persons, not as one attribute, or a collection of attributes, or a series of attributes.

We can’t help the one-at-a-time problem.  That’s built into us; it’s just another human weakness.  However, we’re not forced to pick out one attribute of God, throw all the other attributes away, and build up a wall of separation with anybody who dares to disagree.  That’s the source of tension.  That’s what causes the problem.  That’s what no one has any right to do.  Yet, it happens all the time.

Sources of Single Attribute Thinking

We might suppose that certain logic methods are less prone to this error.  But, lo and behold apophatic thinkers are just as guilty of this as cataphatic ones.  Now why would anybody be so fussy about logic structure and walk into a silly blunder like this?  I think it’s because we have an inherent love for idols, and we just hate it that God is Who He says He is.  How dare God behave like that?  Just Who does He think He is?  In any case, the sources of single attribute thinking are all around us everywhere.  We even have to fight and work to avoid this human tendency in ourselves.  The source of single attribute thinking is our human flesh, which is always at war with God.

Attributes don’t Define God

“God is defined by His unknowability.”  That’s a really dumb thing to say.  Sorry, I don’t mean to be rude.  But, that’s a really dumb thing to say.  Nothing defines God.  God is undefined and undefinable.  Doesn’t anybody study logic anymore?  Legs don’t define the cow.  The cow defines the legs.  Nothing defines God.  God defines everything else.  God defines what it means to know, and God defines what it means not to know; what is possible to know, and what is impossible to know.  Nothing makes sense if you try to take God out of the equation.

Love is the Popular Single Attribute

Are you surprised?  It’s very cool to say things like, “Love defines God.”  I even know of examples where apophatic theologians say such absurd things.  What an apophatic theologian ought to be saying is something like, “God is not unloving.”  Nobody should be saying anything as outrageous as, “Love defines God.”  God defines love!  We wouldn’t even have a clue of what love is like if God hadn’t taught us what it is on the Cross.

People who say things like, “Love defines God,” or Love is God, and sometimes even, “God is Love,” are guilty of creating an idol.  Yes, even though, “God is Love,” comes right out of the Bible, you don’t have to follow the conversation very far to realize that some speakers mean the exact opposite.  We just want to have an idol created in our own image.  I suppose we instinctively know that idols only do what we tell them to do; even though God is “not a tame lion,” and we do have to obey Him (C. S. Lewis, The Chronicles of Narnia).

I don’t suppose that this is a hangover from Hasidism, though sometimes it feels that way.  Hesed is one of the Hebrew words for love.  The tendency of this kind of love is toward a manufactured piety and a superficial mysticism.  It tends to produce the sort of person that is “so heavenly minded, they’re of no earthly good (Oliver Wendell Holmes, perhaps).”  No, I’m not criticizing monasticism.  I have great respect for monasticism.  I’m criticizing folks that have forgotten that the God Who defines love also defines righteousness, and a ton of other things.

I’m addressing folks who have forgotten that our Lord Jesus Christ is a priest forever after the order of Melchisedec (Hebrews 5:6, 10; 7:1, 17, 21).”  Since Paul takes pains to repeat this four times, it must be important.  Zedek is the Hebrew word for justice or righteousness, and Melchisedec means king of justice or righteousness.  In spite of the fact that the Psalms are filled with the word Hesed, the King of Love is not found in the Bible, but the King of Righteousness is.  Certainly, Jesus is the King of Love, but without the King of Righteousness, the King of Love does not exist.

Most of us have figured out that you can’t have one without the other.  As soon as righteousness is removed from the equation, a false sort of love is fabricated which is “of no earthly good.”  Not only is it devoid of reality, but it’s even devoid of love, for love is now reduced to nothing more than a subjective, senseless, nihilism.

Even so, there are multitudes of those who loath any juridical idea of God.  For them a juridical God is a God of hate.  Their denial of reality is astounding.

Monday, July 9, 2012

Let’s Take Nicea Apart, Part III A

Does the Universe turn on a word?  We need the help of Orthodox, Protestant, and Roman theologians to find agreement concerning this word.  The troublesome word is homoousia.  This word has stirred as much controversy as any other, through the centuries.
Historical Development
In the fourth century, there was no theologically acceptable word for the nature of God.  Prominent words were all unsatisfactory, because they carried strong pagan implications with them.  The Church pressed the word ousia, which means property, into service after filling it with new meaning.  This word occurs only twice, in Luke 15:12-13, in the story of the prodigal son.  The question within the Church was, “is the nature of the Son, homoousia (the same), homoiousia (similar), or herteroousia (different) with relationship to the Father?”  The prevailing choice was homoousia (the same), which seems simple to us; but this was a difficult choice in 325.  Some of the modern English renderings of this word are one essence, one in Being, and one substance.  Unfortunately, the word substance unintentionally implies a material physical relationship.  Since the Scripture plainly states that God is Spirit, this is impossible.  Consequently, we much prefer the rendering one essence.
Kinds of Logic
Apophatic, that is negative theology or logic, describes things only in the form of denial of some element or principle: to use a common example found in some liturgies, “God is uncreated.”  Cataphatic, that is positive theology or logic, describes things only in the form of affirmation of some element or principle: to use another common example found in the same liturgies, “God is consubstantial.”  Wikipedia and Marikablogs have detailed discussions of these topics.
Comparison of Logical Approaches
Obviously, both methods have value.  There are problems in logic that can only be solved with an apophatic method; while others yield more readily to a cataphatic approach.  So in the Scripture we find that, “God cannot lie,” as well as, “God is love.”  To deny the value of either approach requires a wisdom greater than that of the Apostles, and must be cast aside by thinking Christians.  Such exclusivistic approaches may give us some interesting things to think about, and this is a good thing.  Yet, to push such approaches beyond meditation and into an exclusivistic dogma is destructive.  Reality is not always either apophatic or cataphatic exclusively.  Reality is best approached with a both apophatic and cataphatic technique.  It is impossible to make, “God is not created,” cataphatic; and it is silly to make, “God is love,” apophatic.  At the end of the day, the frank simplicity of Scripture must reign over all.
A Simple View of the Nature of God
God has essence, efforts, and effects.  In this view, essence is the basic nature of God, usually discussed through a list of attributes.  Efforts are God’s activities, or works.  Effects are all the artifacts left behind because of God’s efforts.
Let’s consider these effects.  God speaks, and things come into existence.  In Genesis 1, God speaks and the Universe is created.  In Exodus 20, God speaks and the Law springs into being.  We only know about God’s essence and efforts because He describes them in His Word.  Without God’s Word, we cannot know about His essence and efforts at all.  However, with God’s Word we can know about them, even though we cannot understand them.  Even though we know about God’s essence and efforts, we affirm that we cannot know God’s essence and efforts.  There is a world of difference between knowing something, and knowing about something.
A Complicated View of the Nature of God
God has essence, energies, efforts, and effects.  This view adds the element of energies to the Simple View; and folks often describe it as, “essence and energies.”  What is different about this view is that all the attributes of God are now placed in this new category, energies.  This leaves the category of essence absolutely empty.  It does have the advantage of emphasizing the unknowability of God.  However, in this view apophatic theology is usually pushed to its illogical extreme.  So, technically, we can’t even talk about the unknowability of God.  There are three very unfortunate things about this view.
Divisive Problems Between the Two Views
One.  It denies that the nature of God can be known by His Revelation, especially where specific statements in Scripture talk about God’s nature.  It also denies that humans have a right to draw logical conclusions from God’s effects about His efforts, from His efforts about His energies, and from His energies about His essence.  While it is true that we must be careful not to deny the Mystery of God, it is absurd to deny this line of reasoning, especially where God’s Word specifically invites it.
Two.  It creates the illusion that two people standing side-by-side in worship recite the same Creed and are therefore in absolute agreement.  The reality is that one may hold the Simple View and the other the Complicated View, and they don’t agree at all.  Their pictures of God and Scripture are radically different.
Three.  It has erected a wall of partition between Christian brothers and sisters that is almost impossible to tear down.  The very thing that The Creed was designed to accomplish: namely, to draw Christian brothers and sisters together in love and unity, is now destroyed by the meaning of a single word.  As a result, many brothers and sisters in Christ have become estranged from each other, and drift hopelessly farther and farther apart with each passing year.  Moreover, the disagreement has even erupted in violence.

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Let’s Take Nicea Apart, Part II

We were in the process of dissecting the Nicene Creed.  Here is the second sentence.  Our version follows the Roman Catholic version.
“We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, one in Being with the Father.  Through him all things were made.”  (http://www.beginningcatholic.com/catholic-nicene-creed.html)
“And [we believe] in One Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages, Light of Light, True God of True God, begotten, not made, being of one essence with the Father; through Whom all things were made.”
Once again, we have not found any significant differences:
·         “We believe” does not exist in the Greek text, but the word, “and,” is there and carries the subject and verb from the first to the second sentence.  Without, “We believe,” the second sentence has no subject or verb, cannot stand alone, and makes no sense.  The “And” was sufficient to carry the subject and verb forward in Greek, and we automatically understand the same thing in English.  Still, we really like the idea that somebody had the courage to say it right out loud.
·         “Eternally begotten” vs. “only-begotten” is not earth shattering; yet it is important, but not because it looks different.  Both ways translate a name, “Monogené.”  Whichever way we translate, “Monogené” means that the Son is the legally designated family Head, the primary Heir.  Because this word is an adjective in use, it’s a little difficult to make a smooth sentence.  The Greek text repeats the idea with a verb, “begotten.”  They didn’t want us to miss the point.  Point One: The Son is, was forever, and always will be the primary Heir.  Point Two: No normal human process formed the Son.  God did not have a child.  The Father begot the Son by an eternal begetting; not be breeding.  This is what “eternally” and “before all ages” both convey with equal force.
·         Nicea (325 AD) always was a living document.  It expresses the thorough Bible study and faith of 318 pastors who were defending the Church.  When Constantinople I (381 AD) ratified Nicea, the Greeks dropped “God from God,” but the Latins did not.  So, it’s not in the Greek text.  We could all get on the same page if everybody dropped it.  It’s unnecessarily repetitious.  Frankly, it sounds too much like, “idol from idols.”  Jesus Christ is Light begotten from Light, and True God begotten from True God.
·         Just in case we were sleeping, “begotten, not made,” says it one more time.  In the Eastern mindset, repetition is always emphatic.  These pastors are yelling.  They write in all capital letters.  THE SON IS NOT A CREATURE!  BREEDING ACTIVITY DID NOT FORM THE SON!  THE SON IS GOD ETERNAL, JUST AS THE FATHER IS GOD ETERNAL!  Ouch, my ears are wringing from all that yelling.  Stop yelling.  We get it.
·         Yes, the Son was active in creation, “through Him/Whom all things were made.”  That’s what the Bible teaches in several places.
Oh sure, there are folks who think that Jesus matured to become God the Son.  However, that’s not Christianity, and you can’t believe this, and still be a Christian.
We covered all the easy points, but we skipped over one really big point.  So, let’s save it for tomorrow, and spend a whole day on it.